Saturday, 27 October 2012

“Jinnah of India”, the could have been of Indian History Part-I


                                      “Jinnah of India”, the could have been of Indian History

                                                                     Part-I

                                                                 By Munish Alagh

Jinnah’s story is an apparent paradox, why did a person considered the greatest “Ambassador of Hindu-Muslim unity”, become the creator of Pakistan, indeed Jinnah, like his fellow Gujarati, Gandhi was an extremely enigmatic figure, but the fact is that we know very little about him, his inomitable will with which he created Pakistan, could have very easily have been directed towards the opposite direction, ie., towards strengthening Hindu-Muslim unity, this blog attempts to study why that did not happen? What are the lessons we should learn from this big failure of Indian nationhood?

From the time when Jinnah in his early days in Britian saw Dadabhai Naoraji struggling against racism Jinnah became an uncomprising enemy of all forms of colour bar and racial prejudice, listening from the Commons gallery in 1893 to Dadabhai’s maiden speech and being thrilled to hear the Grand Old man extol the virtues of “free speech”, Jinnah noted “there he was, an Indian, who would exercise that right and demand justice for his countrymen.” So, thus began  Jinnah’s advent into politics as a liberal nationalist.

It is interesting that when he returned to Bombay, Jinnah’s heroes remained Dadabhai Naoroji and other brilliant Bombay Parsi, Sir Pherozeshah Mehta who, in fact very much was the model for Jinnah’s early career specially with reference to his impassioned advocacy of the role of minorities in India’s nation-building process. Further, in the 1904 Congress, Jinnah first met Gokhale, whose wisdom, fairness, and moderation he came to admire so that he soon stated his “fond ambition” in politics was to become “the Muslim Gokhale.”

Another interesting aspect of these early years is that the doughtiest opponent of the Muslim league in 1906 (in the Aga Khan’s words) was Jinnah, who “came out in bitter hostility toward all that I and my friends had done and were trying to do. He was the only well-known Muslim to take this attitude…..He said that our principle of separate electorates was dividing the nation against itself.” Such an impassioned advocacy against separate electorates by the man who was later responsible for creating Pakistan!!

Jinnah helped write Dadabhai’s speech at the 1906 annual session of the Congress, and the theme of national unity present in this address was echoed by Jinnah at every political meeting he attended during the ensuing decade.

In the decade since he had returned from Britian Jinnah had emerged as the hier apparent to the triumvirate of Gokhale, Mehta and Naoroji, he was free from all parochial and provincial prejudice, also in practical terms Jinnah realised that his strength lay in his secular nationalist appeal.

Jinnah was to rise in the Allahabad Congress of 1910 to second a resolution that “strongly deprecates the expansion or application of the principle of Separate Communal Electorates to Municipalities, District Boards, or other Local Bodies.” Paradoxically, Jinnah spoke at the end of his first year as the Muslim member from Bombay.

Jinnah did join the Muslim League in 1913, but he insisted as a prior condition that his “loyalty to the Muslim League and the Muslim interest would in no way and at no time imply even the shadow of disloyalty to the larger national cause to which his life was dedicated.”

Before Gokhale died, he told Sarojini that Jinnah “has true stuff in him, and that freedom from all sectarian prejudice which will make him the best ambassador of Hindu-Muslim Unity.” In his late thirties Jinnah seems to have personified that tragically elusive spirit of communal amity.

In 1913, at the Agra session of the Muslim League, Jinnah proposed postponing reaffirmation of faith in the principle of “communal representation” for another year. On this issue majority of  the Muslim League members would long remain at odds with Jinnah.

I will end this section with the first sign of trouble in this garden of eden, and we will note that again and again, trouble for Jinnah, came in the form of the Father of the Nation, for when in January !915 the Gujarat Society, which he led, gave a garden party to welcome Gandhi back to India, Gandhi’s response to Jinnah’s urbane welcome was that he was “glad to find a Mahomedan not only belonging to his region’s Sabha, but chairing it. This was very insulting to Jinnah who prided himself on his Cosmopolitan identity. It also set the tone for his relation with Gandhi…which was lead to much trouble later as we shall see in forthcoming blogs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, 12 October 2012

Can the real Indian please stand up...by Munish Alagh


Really let us face upto one fact-your worst enemy can become your best friend and your best friend can become your worst enemy..wasn't it Jinnah who once hailed " the living spirit of patriotism..surging through India's pulse.".."it has taken its rise from a new-born movement in the direction of national unity..brought Hindus and Muslims together involving brotherly service for the common cause."
Let us not be "personality focussed" or leader focussed"...in that case we can make a large list of politicians who should be put behind bars...can we develop a national spirit of unity and move in a positive direction, forgetting the past and focussing on not emotions but tasks...as a secular person i could claim that even Vajpayee is guilty for a lot of things..u can reply by saying that Manmohan, Pawar,Laloo,Mulayam are all guilty...let us develop a culture of accountability not blamibility like Kejriwal...that will be the real Indian Revolution..leading to the "true" Hindu (Growth rate of not less than 10%..but we need to be Arjuns and Lakshmans or atleast Karnas and Hanumaans....)

Gujarat's Growth Story-the true picture, by Dr.Munish Alagh

There has recently been a lot of discussion on Gujarat's growth story...much of it is subjective, what are the relevant objective points...with my training of positive economics i try to have a look below...

Why do we not base our analysis of growth of states on facts rather than being blinded by politics, growth in gujarat needs to be compared like to like...let us just take certain comparable states like Maharashtra(State GDP Growth between 2004-05 to 2011-12=10.01%), Andhra pradesh(State GDP Growth between 2004-05 and 2011-12=8.15%) and Delhi(State GDP Growth between 2004-5 and 2011-12=11.27%)...with that reference Gujarat's growth of 9.2% is not that high...statistics of Gujarat need to be compared with similar income level states...not misinterpreted by adding confusing comparision between Bihar and Gujarat

Reference-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_states_by_GDP

while the contrasting opinion cited in the link below
http://www.firstpost.com/economy/is-the-gujarat-growth-story-for-real-apparently-yes-483390.html
does critique what i have said and what apparently has been observed by business standard editorial before me, the basic point made that growth in maharashtra and andhra pradesh is services oriented
and hence is higher than gujarat's manufacturing growth, infact serves to buttress my point that there is nothing special about the Gujarat story and cities like Hyderabad, Bangalore and Mumbai show a dynamism even more well rounded and multi-faceted than Gujarat cities...these states have made extra effort in services,IT and education and so have reached  where they are...

Monday, 10 September 2012

Know how to live in a Fantasy...About Dhoni,Young India and covering the last mile.


Know how to live in a Fantasy...About Dhoni,Young India and covering the last mile.

Read "One night at a call centre", saw Vicky Donor and Ladies versus Ricky Bahl...realised that the limitations of leaders like Chandrababu Naidu, Digvijaya Singh and even Narendra Modi is symptomatic of the limitations of the younger (comparitively) generation of Indians circa 2012...like Dhoni..we know how to hit six and win World Cup...but lose in the Tests which follow...at some level we have to learn to follow up and complete our tasks...not just announce projects...announce investments...announce Yojanas...but not cover the last mile..this i saw in my visits to Gujarat Districts...the extention oficer was overburdened with administrative tasks...the various Yojanas remained on paper, there was lack of collaboration between Central agencies and State agencies..just like in the works of fiction..we assume that God will complete the work for us...that will never happen...What Young India Wants? Is OK...What Young India should do is more important..Young India at some level wants to live in a Fantasy..ok..but you must know how to live in a fantasy...

Saturday, 1 September 2012

I HAVE TO BE 200% INDIAN WHICH INCLUDES BJP'S HINDUTVA AND IMRAN KHAN'S PAKISTAN

Teeja tera rang tha mein to..what do i feel as an Indian Hindu about my Islamic heritage and identity?Contradictions and Resolutions of the rainbow that is India......


I BELIEVE IN ADVANIS CONCEPT OF HINDUSTANI ISLAM TO SOME EXTENT

I don't have to understand Islam to believe that you must do your duty as a Muslim..and you must protect and preserve all the colours of the rainbows which your sisters in the Hindu community represent,conservative and orthodox as well as liberal and emancipated, you must serve your Hindu sister whether she represents orthodox brahmanical values or Vatsayana and Khajuraho...my heart says i am right and Muhammad is with me...i don't know what  maulvis say...


I know that religiously i may be a semi practicing Hindu and not a practicing Muslim, but culturally i consider myself 33% Muslim(teeja tera rang tha mein to)..and with that identity i consider my foremost duty as a cultural Muslim to preserve and protect every little aspect of my hindu sisters...whether i contradict maulvis teachings or not...i don't care...

To protect every identity of Hindu citizens of India..even if they belong to BJP...even that 25% of BJP voters who are strongly Hindu...to serve those Hindus of Madhya POradesh who believe their duty is to build a Ram Temple in Ayodhya...they may be misguided but it is my duty as a cultural Muslim to protect and preserve my Hindu sisters like Uma Bharati who are trapped in their little boxes of orthodox Hindutva...but otherwise love their Musdlim brothers..

I BELIEVE IN JINNAH'S CONCEPT OF PAKISTAN TO SOME EXTENT

Also as a Hindu, it is my duty to be proud of my heritage whether it is Akbar, Jahangir, Shahjahan or even Aurangzeb to realise that they were products of those times and not judge them with todays values...also keep them in the past and not let todays identity be confused with history.

Before i enter a temple of Krishna...to know that no Muslim in Gujarat or Bombay is being punished because he wants to eat beef...to know that the prejudice of orthodox Hindus does not interfere with the food cycle...this i must do, before i enter a krishna temple...

Likewise to protect those Muslims who follow the Shariat...even if it is against my concept of "Indianness"...also to protect those Muslims who are aggressive defenders of their faith...


I HAVE TO BE 200% INDIAN WHICH INCLUDES BJP'S HINDUTVA AND IMRAN KHAN'S PAKISTAN

Tuesday, 7 August 2012

Thinking Fast and Slow: An Introduction from the Book on Behavioral Economics (2011) by Daniel Kahneman-Noble Laureate.


Introduction
The hope for informed gossip is that there are distinctive patterns in the errors people make. Systematic errors are known as biases, and they recur predictably in particular circumstances. When the handsome and confident speaker bounds onto the stage, for example, you can anticipate that the audience will judge his comments more favourably than he deserves. The availability of a diagonistic label for this bias-the halo effect-makes it easier to anticipate, recognize, and understand.
Most impressions and thoughts arise in your conscious experience without your knowing how they got there. The mental work that produces impressions, intuitions, and many decisions goes on in silence in our mind.
Much of the discussion in this book is about biases of intuition. As we navigate our lives, we normally allow ourselves to be guided by impressions and feelings, and the confidence we have in our intuitive beliefs and preferences is usually justified. But not always. We are often confident even when we are wrong, and an objective observer is more likely to detect our errors than we are.
So this is the authors aim: improve the ability to identify and understand errors of judgement and choice, in others and eventually in ourselves, by providing a richer and more precise language to discuss them. In at least some cases, an accurate diagnosis may suggest an intervention to limit the damage that bad judgements and choices often cause.
Origins
This book presents the authors current understanding of judgement and decision making, which has been shaped by psychological discoveries of recent decades. However, he traces the central ideas to the lucky day in 1969 when he asked a colleague, Amos Tversky to speak as a guest to a seminar. His colleague talked about-Are people good intuitive statisticians? He reported that the answer was a qualified yes. They had a lively debate in the seminar and ultimately concluded that a qualified no was a better answer.
Amos and he enjoyed the exchange and concluded that intuitive statistics was an interesting topic and would be fun to explore it together.
They found that expert colleagues also, like them, greatly exaggerated the likelihood that the original result of an experiment would be successfully replicated even with a small sample. They also gave very poor advice to a fictitious graduate student about the number of observations she needed to collect. Even statisticians were not good intuitive statisticians.
A theory was emerging in their mind about the role of  resemblance in predictions, they tested the theory for example by taking an illustration of a person with characteristics that resembled a stereotypical li9brarian, and found that most people thought of him as that, they ignored other statistics, such as, there are more farmers in US and used resemblance as a simplifying heuristic to make a difficult judgement, this caused predictable biases in their predictions.
People judged the size of catewgoriesby the ease with which instances came to their mind-the availability characteristic
Social scientists of the 70s assumed people are rational and they depart from rationality due to emotions, Amos and Daniel documented systematic errors in the thinking of normal people and traced these errors to the design of machinery of cognition rather than corruption caused by emotion.
The full text of questions asked to respondents was included by the authors in their articles, serving  as demonstrations of cognitive biases to the rewaders.
Then they shifted to decision making under uncertainty:Prospect Theory.
Where we are now:
Our everyday intuitive abilities are no less marvelous than the striking insights of an experienced fire fighter or physician-only more common.According to the great Herbert Simon: “Intuition is nothing more or less than recognition”
The essence of intuitive heuristics is that when we are faced with a difficult question, we often answer an easier one instead, usually without noticing the substitution.
Spontaneous search often fails, leading to more deliberate thinking.
The author describes mental life by the metaphor of two agents, System1 and 2, fast and slow thinking.
What comes next in the book:
Part 1:Two systems approach to judgement and choice. Automatic operations of System 1 of thinking and controlled operations of System 2.
Part 2 explains that Statistics requires thinking of many things at once which System 1 is not designed to do.
Part 3 describes how overconfidence is fed by the illusory certainty of hindsight.
Part 4 describes the the unfortunate tendency to treat problems in isolation and with framing effects.
Part 5 describes two selves, experiencing self and remembering self, and how we can exploit memories, so a more painful experience leaves a better memory from among two painful experiences.
A concluding chapter explores implications of three distinctions, experiencing and remembering self, agents in classical and behavioral economics and automatic System1 and effortful system 2.

Sunday, 29 July 2012

WHAT R GOOD SIGNS/BAD SIGNS ABOUT WHAT SHE TELLS U?



You should be happy when she says:I want to c the cofee table books in yr home you can drop me back;Be sad when she says-I've come with the gang have to go back with them..Be happy when she says  O U r so funneee...i've never laughed so much...Be sad when she says..u Tire me out..Be happy when she says...O I've laways got time for U, just come, Be sad when she says...I'll be busy its Radhika Didis marriage i may not have time...Be happy when she says...U hit that late cut superbly, I was watching...Be sad when she says..learn something from Deepak, he's such a champ
Be happy when she says ...thats a nice Activa u have there, let's go for a ride..Be sad when she says...I'll go with Rohit in his new mobike, u can follow with Sandhya in your activa; Be happy when she says:O u go swimming in sports club we'll go there and have Chinese later at Stadium, Be sad when she says:Rohits got membership in Rifle club, the water there is cleaner; Be happy when she says:O so u go to CTF and have litchi juice after athletics practice, don't u want company?, Be sad when she says: U r so fat already whatever u work out u put on by hogging;Be happy when she says:I saw u at atira the other day, we can walk together from today, be sad when she says-I like to walk only with my exercise friend Rohit, we keep tempo; Be happy when she says,U r my seventh best friend, be sad when she says-I don't believe in comparing friends,nyways we are just getting to know each other; Be happy when she says:Can u show me how to solve that sum?be sad when she says:U'll really get along with my friend Panauti, i'll try to fix u guys up...